FAST Practice Quiz

Author's Claims & Evidence
Grade 7 Reading
FL B.E.S.T. Standard: ELA.7.R.2.4
10 Questions
/10
Directions: Read each argumentative passage carefully. Analyze the author's claims, evaluate the evidence, and identify any weaknesses in the reasoning.
Social Media and Teen Mental Health

Social media platforms should require users to be at least 16 years old. While these platforms offer some benefits, the risks to younger teenagers' mental health outweigh any advantages.

Research from the American Psychological Association shows that adolescents who spend more than three hours daily on social media double their risk of experiencing anxiety and depression symptoms. A 2023 study published in JAMA Pediatrics found that middle school students who use social media frequently show changes in brain regions associated with emotional sensitivity.

Social media companies design their platforms to be addictive. Former Facebook executive Sean Parker admitted that the platform was designed to exploit "a vulnerability in human psychology." Features like infinite scroll, notifications, and likes trigger dopamine responses that make it difficult for developing teenage brains to regulate usage.

Some argue that social media helps teens stay connected, especially during events like the pandemic. However, studies suggest these connections often lack the depth of in-person friendships and can actually increase feelings of isolation when teens compare their lives to the curated images they see online.

Until platforms take meaningful steps to protect young users, age restrictions offer the most practical protection for vulnerable adolescents.

1
What is the author's CENTRAL CLAIM?
A
Social media causes anxiety and depression in all teenagers.
B
Social media platforms should require users to be at least 16 years old.
C
Social media companies only care about making money.
D
In-person friendships are always better than online connections.
2
Which piece of evidence is MOST credible?
A
The JAMA Pediatrics study about brain changes in middle schoolers
B
The author's claim that online connections "lack depth"
C
The statement that platforms are designed to be addictive
D
The mention of Sean Parker's admission
3
The author addresses a counterargument in paragraph 4. How does the author respond to the claim that social media helps teens stay connected?
A
By admitting that social media has significant benefits
B
By arguing that online connections lack depth and may increase isolation
C
By ignoring the counterargument completely
D
By attacking the people who make this argument
4
What additional evidence would MOST strengthen this argument?
A
More personal stories from teenagers who felt sad after using social media
B
Data comparing mental health outcomes in countries with different age restrictions
C
Quotes from parents who limit their children's social media use
D
Information about which social media platforms are most popular
The Case Against Zoos

Zoos should be abolished. These institutions imprison innocent animals for human entertainment, causing tremendous suffering that no educational benefit can justify.

Think about it: would you want to spend your entire life in a cage? Of course not! Animals feel the same way. Just last month, I visited a local zoo and saw an elephant pacing back and forth - a clear sign of psychological distress. If one elephant is suffering, surely all zoo animals must be miserable.

Zoo supporters claim these facilities help conservation, but this is just propaganda. Zoos make millions of dollars from admission fees, gift shops, and food sales. They care about profit, not animals. Anyone who supports zoos is supporting animal cruelty.

The only ethical choice is to close all zoos immediately and release the animals. Either we care about animal welfare or we don't. There is no middle ground.

5
The author uses ONE observation of ONE elephant to conclude that "all zoo animals must be miserable." This is an example of which logical fallacy?
A
Bandwagon
B
Hasty Generalization
C
False Cause
D
Appeal to Authority
6
"Anyone who supports zoos is supporting animal cruelty" is an example of which logical fallacy?
A
Hasty Generalization
B
Either/Or (False Dilemma)
C
Ad Hominem
D
Bandwagon
7
Compare the QUALITY OF EVIDENCE in the two passages. Which passage has stronger evidence?
A
Passage 2, because it uses emotional language that connects with readers
B
Passage 1, because it cites specific studies from credible sources
C
Passage 2, because it includes a personal observation from a zoo visit
D
Both passages have equally strong evidence
8
Identify TWO ways Passage 2's argument could be IMPROVED. Be specific about what evidence or changes would strengthen it.
9
Both passages make claims about protecting vulnerable groups (young teenagers, animals). How do their approaches to supporting these claims DIFFER? Use evidence from both texts.
10
A strong argument should have a clear claim, logical reasons, credible evidence, and address counterarguments. Using these criteria, evaluate Passage 1's argument. What does it do well? What could be improved?
___Multiple Choice (7)
___Written Response (3)
___Total (10)